INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, CITIZENSHIP, AND CIVIL REGISTRATION: A Jurisprudential Dichotomy

Authors

  • Caroline Mocellin Tabeliã de Notas e Registradora Civil das Pessoas Naturais de Peritiba/SC. Mestranda em Direito no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade do Oeste Catarinense – UNOESC. Bolsista da Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de Santa Catarina. Integrante do Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Interculturalidade, Intersubjetividade de Gênero e Personalidade
  • Thaís Janaina Wenczenovicz Docente Titular na Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul. Professora no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito (Mestrado e Doutorado)/UNOESC.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2009-3578.2025v11n2p219-234

Keywords:

citizenship; human dignity; integrationism; Indigenous peoples; civil registration; decent work.

Abstract

The present article aims to analyze how the civil registration of birth of Indigenous peoples has been understood and assimilated within Brazilian labor jurisprudence. This analysis considers two contrasting interpretations derived from a summary examination of relevant case law, which stand in diametrical opposition. On one hand, the registration is viewed as fundamentally important for the protection of human dignity and the assurance of free, autonomous, and full exercise of citizenship—of which the right to work is a corollary. On the other hand, there emerges a persistent association, by the legal apparatus, of civil registration with an integrationist ideal rooted in a historical process of dehumanization and depersonalization of Indigenous cultural identity and ancestry—elements that are existentially intrinsic to Indigenous peoples. This research, which is far from gratuitous, adopts as a paradigm the jurisprudence of the Regional Labor Court of the 12th Region, whose jurisdiction encompasses the state of Santa Catarina. It seeks to, simultaneously, demystify the civil registration of Indigenous peoples—dissociating it from an obsolete and undemocratic ideological framework—and to examine how this registration is perceived and positioned within a legal system that has historically failed to recognize Indigenous singularity. To this end, the article will first outline the central problem identified, and subsequently—mindful of the sensitivity of the topic—clarify how decolonial thought is necessary for the construction of a new juridical culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARAÚJO. Luiz Alberto David; NUNES JÚNIOR, Vidal Serrano. Curso de Direito Constitucional. 8. ed. rev. e atual. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2004, p. 79.

HEEMAN, Aragon Thimotie. Por uma releitura do Direito dos Povos Indígenas: do Integracionismo ao interculturalismo. Revista de Doutrina e Jurisprudência. v. 53. p. 1-14. Brasília, 2017, p. 6.

SANTOS FILHO, Roberto Lemos dos. Apontamentos sobre o direito indígena. Curitiba: Juruá, 2012, p. 45.

WENCZENOVICZ, Thais Janaina. À escuta da aldeia: marcadores sociais e a memória nas comunidades indígenas no Brasil Meridional. 2. ed. revisada e ampliada. Joaçaba: Editora Unoesc, 2023, p. 41.

Published

2025-07-08

How to Cite

Mocellin, C., & Wenczenovicz, T. J. (2025). INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, CITIZENSHIP, AND CIVIL REGISTRATION: A Jurisprudential Dichotomy. INTERFERENCE: A JOURNAL OF AUDIO CULTURE, 11(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.36557/2009-3578.2025v11n2p219-234

Issue

Section

Original Article