LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH TO THE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT INCISIONAL HERNIA: TECHNICAL ADVANCES AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2009-3578.2026v12n2p395-411Resumo
Recurrent incisional hernia represents a relevant challenge in abdominal wall surgery because of the anatomical changes resulting from previous procedures, the presence of adhesions, compromised tissue quality, and the risk of further recurrence. In this context, the laparoscopic approach has become established as an alternative to open repair, particularly because it allows access to the abdominal cavity through planes different from those previously dissected, wide visualization of the defect, and placement of prostheses with adequate overlap, in addition to a potential reduction in wound-related complications. At the same time, the evolution of laparoscopic repair, from the conventional intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) to strategies involving fascial defect closure, IPOM-plus, and minimally invasive extraperitoneal and retromuscular techniques, has substantially changed the principles of abdominal wall reconstruction. The objective of this study was to critically review the available evidence on the laparoscopic approach to the treatment of recurrent incisional hernia, with emphasis on technical advances, perioperative outcomes, recurrence, complications, and long-term outcomes. A narrative review of the literature was carried out using a structured search strategy for studies related to recurrent incisional hernia, laparoscopic repair, mesh placement, fascial closure, and surgical outcomes. The available evidence suggests that laparoscopic repair can provide satisfactory results in appropriately selected patients, with recurrence rates comparable to those of open repair and a lower occurrence of certain wound complications, although it carries specific risks, particularly bowel injury during adhesiolysis. Advances such as primary defect closure and improved prosthetic positioning have sought to restore abdominal wall function and reduce seroma, bulging, and recurrence. However, the technical and methodological heterogeneity of the studies, together with the scarcity of investigations specifically addressing recurrent hernias with prolonged follow-up, still limits definitive conclusions. It is concluded that laparoscopy holds a relevant position in the treatment of recurrent incisional hernia, but its indication should be individualized according to defect characteristics, previous procedures, clinical conditions, and the experience of the surgical team.
Downloads
Referências
AL-QUDIMAT, A. R.; ZAROUR, A.; AL-TAWEEL, R.; AL-AWADAT, A. I.; BAWADI, H. Comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of recurrent incisional hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies on recurrence and complications. World Journal of Surgery, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1262-1271, 2026. DOI: 10.1002/wjs.70272. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70272. Accessed on: 21 Jun. 2026.
CHEN, F.; YANG, H.; WANG, F.; ZHU, Y.; CHEN, J. Outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair by open and laparoscopic approaches: a propensity score-matched comparison. Hernia, v. 27, n. 5, p. 1289-1298, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02833-9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02833-9. Accessed on: 22 Apr. 2026.
FERRARI, G.; BERTOGLIO, C.; MAGISTRO, C.; GIRARDI, V.; MAZZOLA, M.; DI LERNIA, S.; PUGLIESE, R. Laparoscopic repair for recurrent incisional hernias: a single institute experience of 10 years. Hernia, v. 17, n. 5, p. 573-580, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1098-3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1098-3. Accessed on: 21 Apr. 2026.
HENRIKSEN, N. A.; HELGSTRAND, F. Prospective nationwide analysis of long-term recurrence rates after elective ventral, incisional and parastomal hernia repairs. BJS Open, v. 8, n. 4, zrae070, 2024. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae070. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae070. Accessed on: 11 May. 2026.
HOFFMANN, H.; KÖCKERLING, F.; ADOLF, D.; MAYER, F.; WEYHE, D.; REINPOLD, W.; FORTELNY, R.; KIRCHHOFF, P. Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes. Hernia, v. 25, n. 1, p. 61-75, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Accessed on: 11 May. 2026.
HUANG, X.; SHAO, X.; CHENG, T.; LI, J. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia, v. 28, n. 2, p. 385-400, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Accessed on: 15 Jun. 2026.
KÖCKERLING, F. Recurrent incisional hernia repair: an overview. Frontiers in Surgery, v. 6, 26, 2019. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00026. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00026. Accessed on: 15 Jun. 2026.
KOKOTOVIC, D.; BISGAARD, T.; HELGSTRAND, F. Long-term recurrence and complications associated with elective incisional hernia repair. JAMA, v. 316, n. 15, p. 1575-1582, 2016. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.15217. Accessed on: 18 Jun. 2026.
LAVANCHY, J. L.; BUFF, S. E.; KOHLER, A.; CANDINAS, D.; BELDI, G. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open intraperitoneal onlay mesh incisional hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 33, n. 1, p. 225-233, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6298-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6298-6. Accessed on: 10 May. 2026.
LINDMARK, M.; TALL, J.; DARKAHI, B.; ÖSTERBERG, J.; STRIGÅRD, K.; THORELL, A.; GUNNARSSON, U. Recurrence rate and mesh bulging are reduced with primary fascial closure in ventral hernia repair: the PROSECO randomized clinical trial. British Journal of Surgery, v. 112, n. 9, znaf169, 2025. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf169. Accessed on: 10 May. 2026.
RASADOR, A. C. D.; SILVEIRA, C. A. B.; FERNANDEZ, M. G.; DIAS, Y. J. M.; MARTIN, R. R. H.; MAZZOLA POLI DE FIGUEIREDO, S. Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM+) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 39, n. 2, p. 1251-1260, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11377-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11377-7. Accessed on: 18 Apr. 2026.
SANDERS, D. L.; PAWLAK, M. M.; SIMONS, M. P. et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society. British Journal of Surgery, v. 110, n. 12, p. 1732-1768, 2023. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad284. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad284. Accessed on: 11 Apr. 2026.
VAN VEENENDAAL, N.; POELMAN, M.; APERS, J.; CENSE, H.; SCHREURS, H.; SONNEVELD, E.; VAN DER VELDE, S.; BONJER, J. The INCH-trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing short- and long-term outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for incisional hernia repair. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, n. 12, p. 9147-9158, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10446-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10446-7. Accessed on: 15 Apr. 2026.
VERBO, A.; PETITO, L.; MANNO, A.; COCO, C.; MATTANA, C.; LURATI, M.; PEDRETTI, G.; RIZZO, G.; SERMONETA, D.; LODOLI, C.; NUNZIATA, J.; D'UGO, D. Laparoscopic approach to recurrent incisional hernia repair: a 3-year experience. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, v. 17, n. 5, p. 591-595, 2007. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.0133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.0133. Accessed on: 18 Apr. 2026.
ZHUANG, X. Methodological concern regarding laparoscopic versus open repair of recurrent incisional hernia. World Journal of Surgery, v. 50, p. 2502-2503, 2026. DOI: 10.1002/wjs.70474. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70474. Accessed on: 14 May. 2026.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Rielli Ciambelli Netta, Sophia Evaristo Coércio, Diego da Silva Marques, João Pedro Matsumoto Alves, Elisângela Aparecida Cóis Ferreira, Camila Menon Oliveros, Laura Moreira Montanhini, Larissa Matsumoto Laraya, Mariany Carrenho Caetano, Juliane Maria de Oliveira Alvarez, Tais Aline Bregion dos Santos, Julia Vitória Vendramini Goyogi de Paula, Ana Raquel de Almeida Goto, Cristiano Machado Galhardi, Rodolfo de Oliveira Medeiros

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Você tem o direito de:
- Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
- Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
- Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.