BETWEEN ALGORITHMS AND KNOWLEDGE: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TEACHER EDUCATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Autores

  • Rodolfo de Oliveira Medeiros
  • Aline Maria Noli Mascarin
  • Juliana Pascon dos Santos
  • Cristiano Machado Galhardi
  • Cíntia Gisele de Andrade Pozenato
  • Josiane Ramos Garcia Rodrigues
  • Lívia Faria Orso
  • Fernanda Moerbeck Cardoso Mazzetto
  • Maria José Sanches Marin
  • Kelly Cristina Encide de Vasconcelos Donadai
  • Fábio Augusto Freiria Barbosa
  • Wilson Bernardo Silva
  • Domingos Donizeti Roque
  • Percyleine Pelegrine Herculiani
  • Laila Abrão
  • Jessica Gimenes Araújo Lopes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2009-3578.2025v11n2p3167-3183

Palavras-chave:

artificial intelligence; teacher education; higher education.

Resumo

Introduction: The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly generative tools such as ChatGPT, has profoundly impacted educational processes. In the context of teacher education, these impacts go beyond the technical use of AI and raise discussions around epistemology, ethics, and pedagogical culture. Objective: To analyze the scientific literature on the use of artificial intelligence in the education of higher education teachers, with an emphasis on the pedagogical, ethical, and cultural implications associated with its integration. Method: This is an Integrative Literature Review, developed based on the PICo strategy: P (higher education teachers), I (use of artificial intelligence in teacher education), Co (educational contexts). The search was conducted in the SciELO, LILACS, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, covering the period from 2019 to 2025. After applying the eligibility criteria and analyzing the data using the PRISMA model, 12 articles were included in the final corpus and systematized in a summary table, with evidence levels classified according to the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: The selected studies highlight the growing interest in AI in teacher education over the past three years, with a predominance of qualitative approaches and publications from Latin America, Western Europe, and North America. The literature emphasizes both innovative educational experiences and concerns about the instrumentalization of teaching, the superficiality of pedagogical mediation, and the ethical risks of uncritical AI usage. Discussion: The analysis reveals a tension between two approaches: one that promotes AI as an automation tool, and another that advocates for its critical and ethical mediation, valuing the teacher’s role as author and educator. These findings underscore the urgency of policies and continuing education programs that incorporate AI with pedagogical intentionality. Final considerations: The presence of AI in teacher education demands not only technical skills but also ethical discernment, critical reflection, and commitment to emancipatory educational practices. This study contributes to expanding the debate and supporting professional development strategies aligned with the complexities of contemporary teaching.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Al-Zahrani, A. M. Unveiling the shadows: beyond the hype of AI in education. Heliyon, v. 10, n. 9, e30696, 3, 2024. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11087970/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30696. Accessed on: July 6, 2025.

An, Y.; Yu, J. H.; James, S. Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 22, art. 10, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3. Available at: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3. Accessed on: July 1, 2025.

Burneo-Arteaga, P. et al. Capability-based training framework for generative AI in higher education. Frontiers in Education, v. 10, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1594199. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1594199/full. Accessed on: June 27, 2025.

Francis, N. J.; Jones, S.; Smith, D. P. Generative AI in higher education: balancing innovation and integrity. British Journal of Biomedical Science, v. 81, art. 14048, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11756388/. Accessed on: June 26, 2025.

Ganong, L. H. Integrative reviews of nursing research. Research Nursing Health, v. 10, n. 1, p. 01–10, 1987. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3644366/. Accessed on: June 30, 2025.

Kim, Do Own (Donna). Reflection-AI: artificial intelligence or algorithmic instruction problem? Empowering students through situated knowledges-based reflexivity. Frontiers in Communication, v. 10, 2025. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1598082/full. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1598082. Accessed on: July 3, 2025.

Lemes, M. A. et al. Evaluation strategies in active learning in higher education in health: integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, v. 47, n. 2, 2021. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/reben/a/KG8VgQhpKf9ySfCwjkyNY6w/?format=pdf&lang=en. Accessed on: June 30, 2025.

Lockwood, C. et al. Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In: Aromataris, E; Munn, Z. (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. Available at: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355860482. Accessed on: June 26, 2025.

Lu, X.; Yang, C. Educational pathways for enhancing algorithmic transparency: a discussion based on the phenomenological reduction method. AI & Society, [S.l.], 2025. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02475-8. Accessed on: July 3, 2025.

Ofosu-Asare, Y. Cognitive imperialism in artificial intelligence: counteracting bias with indigenous epistemologies. AI & Society, v. 40, p. 3045–3061, 2025. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-024-02065-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02065-0. Accessed on: July 6, 2025.

Qian, Y. Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: a systematic review of the field. TechTrends, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1. Accessed on: June 26, 2025.

Pikhart, M.; Al-Obaydi, L. H. Reporting the potential risk of using AI in higher education: subjective perspectives of educators. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, v. 18, art. 100693, May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100693. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001083. Accessed on: July 1, 2025.

Powell, W.; Courchesne, S. Opportunities and risks involved in using ChatGPT to create first grade science lesson plans. PLoS ONE, v. 19, n. 6, e0305337, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305337. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11182495/. Accessed on: July 2, 2025.

Ren, X.; Wu, M. L. Examining teaching competencies and challenges while integrating artificial intelligence in higher education. TechTrends, v. 69, p. 519–538, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01055-3. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-025-01055-3. Accessed on: June 28, 2025.

Ruano-Borbalan, J. C. The transformative impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: a critical reflection on current trends and futures directions. International Journal of Chinese Education, v. 14, n. 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X251319364. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2212585X251319364. Accessed on: June 27, 2025.

Sarzi, L. Z.; Ramos, D. K.; Lucas, M. R. A competência digital docente a partir do ensino remoto de emergência: uma revisão de literatura. Interacções, v. 21, n. 72, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25755/int.36415. Available at: https://revistas.rcaap.pt/interaccoes/index. Accessed on: June 25, 2025.

Singun, A. J. Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Discover Education, v. 4, art. 37, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9. Accessed on: June 25, 2025.

Stern, C.; Jordan, Z.; McArthur, A. Developing the review question and inclusion criteria. The American Journal of Nursing, v. 14, n. 4, p. 53–56, 2014. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24681476/. Accessed on: June 30, 2025.

Tan, X. et al. Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: a systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 8, 100355, June 2025. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24001589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355. Accessed on: July 5, 2025.

Van Den Berg, G.; Du Plessis, E. ChatGPT and generative AI: possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, v. 13, n. 10, art. 998, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/10/998. Accessed on: July 2, 2025.

Vasco-Delgado, J. C. et al. Educación inclusiva con inteligencia artificial: personalización curricular para estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales. Modern Language Association Journal, v. 3, n. 2, 2025. Available at: https://mlaj-revista.org/index.php/journal/article/view/84. Accessed on: July 3, 2025.

Wang, K.; Cui, W.; Yuan, X. Artificial intelligence in higher education: the impact of need satisfaction on artificial intelligence literacy mediated by self-regulated learning strategies. Behavioral Sciences (Basel), v. 15, n. 2, art. 165, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020165. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11851560/. Accessed on: July 5, 2025.

Xia, Q.; Weng, X.; Ouyang, F. et al. A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 21, art. 40, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z. Available at: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z. Accessed on: June 30, 2025.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-09-18

Como Citar

Medeiros, R. de O., Mascarin, A. M. N., Santos, J. P. dos, Galhardi, C. M., Pozenato, C. G. de A., Rodrigues, J. R. G., … Lopes, J. G. A. (2025). BETWEEN ALGORITHMS AND KNOWLEDGE: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TEACHER EDUCATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION. INTERFERENCE: A JOURNAL OF AUDIO CULTURE, 11(2), 3167–3183. https://doi.org/10.36557/2009-3578.2025v11n2p3167-3183

Edição

v. 11 n. 2 (2025): IJAC - QUALIS A2

Seção

Revisão de Literatura

Licença

Copyright (c) 2025 Rodolfo de Oliveira Medeiros, Aline Maria Noli Mascarin, Juliana Pascon dos Santos, Cristiano Machado Galhardi, Cíntia Gisele de Andrade Pozenato, Josiane Ramos Garcia Rodrigues, Lívia Faria Orso, Fernanda Moerbeck Cardoso Mazzetto, Maria José Sanches Marin, Kelly Cristina Encide de Vasconcelos Donadai, Fábio Augusto Freiria Barbosa, Wilson Bernardo Silva, Domingos Donizeti Roque, Percyleine Pelegrine Herculiani, Laila Abrão, Jessica Gimenes Araújo Lopes

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Você tem o direito de:

  1. Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
  2. Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.

De acordo com os termos seguintes:

  1. Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
  2. Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.